logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 대전지방법원 천안지원 2017.07.13 2016고정735 (1)
사기
Text

Defendant

A shall be punished by a fine of KRW 10 million, and Defendant B shall be punished by a fine of KRW 500,000.

The above fines are imposed by the Defendants.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

[Final Judgment falling under the latter part of Article 37 of the Criminal Act with respect to Defendant A] Defendant A was sentenced to an order to attend a training course for 2 years and 80 hours during the suspension of the execution of 8 months due to a violation of the Act on the Aggravated Punishment, etc. of Specific Crimes in the Support of the Daejeon District Court on June 9, 2016, and the judgment became final and conclusive on June 17, 2016.

[Criminal facts committed by Defendant A with others except Defendant B] Defendant A, who pretended to have a traffic accident with many people and intentional accidents, received as if the completion of the insurance company was caused by a de facto waterway traffic accident, and conspired with Defendant A by receiving and distributing the large amount of agreement, medical expenses, repair expenses, etc. from each insurance company.

1. Defendant A, who committed joint crimes with D, E, and F, was waiting for a signal signalling vehicle while Defendant A driven a G observer on the road near the Seongbuk-gu Seongbuk-gu Seongbuk-gu Seongbuk-gu Seongbuk-gu, Yancheon-gu, Yancheon-gu, 17:18 on February 4, 2013 by telephone around February 17:28, 201

D Driving E, F, H, and I Lone Star vehicle shocked its back, and received and claimed insurance for modern commercial reinsurance.

However, in fact, Defendant A intentionally caused an accident in collusion with D, E, or F, and there was no actual injury due to the accident.

Nevertheless, in collusion with D, E, and F, Defendant A deceiving the victim's re-insurance in the modern sea, and it was acquired by receiving insurance money of KRW 2,386,630 in total from the victim company on February 5, 2013 as agreed money and medical expenses from each account.

2. Defendant A who committed a joint crime with J is a telephone call around 15:15 on February 24, 2013, and Defendant A was walking along on the road located in the new principle of budget establishment at the time of budget establishment around 13:20 on the same day.

J’s bridge was shocked, and received and claimed insurance for modern commercial reinsurance in the modern sea.

However, it is true that Defendant A conspired with J and caused the accident, and J is on the bridge due to the above accident.

arrow