logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 전주지방법원 2019.01.11 2018고정277
상해
Text

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 300,000.

When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

The defendant and the victim C (the other is 28 years of age, the other is the husband and wife on February 10, 2018, and the case was processed by the former So-gu D apartment E within the former So-gu Seoul Metropolitan City's residence on February 17, 2018.

The Defendant, by hand, assaulted the victim's shoulder 10 times, 10 tights of the victim's shoulder, her face one time, and her face three times with a bad hand, and inflicted an injury on the catitis, etc. requiring treatment for about two weeks.

Summary of Evidence

Defendant’s partial statement

Witness

B, the application of C’s testimony-related photographs, injury diagnosis reports, etc.

1. Article 257 (1) of the Criminal Act and the choice of a fine concerning the crime;

1. Articles 70 (1) and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;

1. The Defendant and C in charge of the charge of not guilty portion of Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act of the provisional payment order was treated as a domestic violence in the former So-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government D Apartment E residential area around 17:00 on February 10, 2018, and thus became a mutual vision.

The defendant had the shoulder of the victim B(51 years of age and inn) who was fighting, and had approximately 3 weeks of medical treatment, and suffered the injury of the cage cage cage cage cage 5, which requires medical treatment.

Judgment

In this regard, the defendant asserts to the effect that B was fighting together in the middle of B fighting.

The police officer called up on the day of the instant case, and the Defendant and C voluntarily moved to a police box. B submitted a bill of accusation on February 21, 2018, which was later 11 days after the occurrence of the instant case.

And on the day of the instant case, C made a statement to the police officer that “A was pushed ahead of B” (Evidence No. 11 of the Evidence Records) and thereafter there is a difference from the statements in the investigative agency and this court.

B stated in the accusation that “A was pushed with her own and C,” and in this court, I stated to the same effect (contest 5 pages), and C made a statement to the effect that the Defendant was smuggling (contest 4 pages), and that the Defendant alone carried out two names.

arrow