A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for four months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

The defendant is a person who suffers from sternal disease and is residing in the Dong-gu B Building C in Ansan-si.

On May 17, 2019, around 23:20 on May 17, 2019, the Defendant found the disturbance in the adjoining building No. B building No. D without any particular reason and moved to the Defendant’s office C by means of a direction of a slopeF for the Estation belonging to the Ansan Police Station, which called out after receiving 112 reports.

The Defendant continued to have a sound at all times, and the assistant F called the G Mental Hospital where the Defendant had been hospitalized in the past.

The Defendant: (a) expressed his desire to sloping F to “Skakia, Haakia, and Haakia,” and (b) expressed quih to both descendants of F with the hand saw, and (c) assaulted to Bucks twice, and obstructed the police officer’s legitimate performance of public duties concerning the handling of the reported case.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Each police statement made to F and H;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to photographs damaged;

1. Relevant Article 136 (1) of the Criminal Act, the choice of criminal punishment, and the choice of imprisonment;

1. Article 10 (2) and Article 55 (1) 3 of the Criminal Act for mitigation of mental disorders;

1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act;

1. Circumstances unfavorable to the reasons for sentencing under Article 62-2 of the Probation and Medical Treatment and Custody Act and Article 44-2 and Article 2-3 subparag. 1 of the Medical Treatment and Custody Act: In light of the contents and circumstances of the instant crime committed by the police officer who performed official duties, the circumstances that are favorable to the nature of the crime are recognized: the fact that the police officer who gets involved in the crime is deemed to have paid some of the medical expenses; the fact that the police officer was deemed to have paid some of the medical expenses; the fact that there is no record of criminal punishment domestically; the defendant's age, character, character, environment, family relationship, the degree of obstruction of the performance of official duties, the motive and circumstance of the crime; and the circumstances after the crime are revealed in the trial process.