logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 수원지방법원 2019.12.17 2018가단524913
손해배상(기)
Text

1. The plaintiff's claim is dismissed.

2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

Reasons

1. Basic facts

A. On April 1, 1995, the Plaintiff was appointed as a public official of Grade C 5 and retired on May 7, 2013 through the facility management team leader on December 31, 2018.

B. On September 1, 1978, the Defendant was appointed as the Second Lieutenant to the Army and was on October 2008, and was appointed as a public official of Grade C 4 in career service around November 1, 2008, and retired on June 5, 2009 from office as the head of the facility management team and the head of the facility business division on April 1, 2013, while serving as the head of the facility business division on June 30, 2015.

[Ground for recognition] Unsatisfy

2. The parties' assertion

A. The plaintiff's cause of the plaintiff was responsible for the management team leader of the facility management team and the defendant engaged in improper conduct, such as participating in the interest related to the facility construction. Although the plaintiff had a golf club representative and the representative of the rooftop waterproof and the construction company had changed, the existing company was actually engaged in inappropriate work, such as continuing construction.

Accordingly, the Plaintiff followed the position of the head of the facility management team on May 7, 2013, and received a statement of reason from D on September 5, 2013 in order to prevent the recurrence of the foregoing improper work. The Defendant repeatedly bullying the Plaintiff from the time of his retirement to the time of his retirement, as described in the following (i) to (vii).

Due to these illegal acts by the defendant, the plaintiff suffered from male, stress, chrostypitis, etc., and from March 2017, the result of the real name of the sediment, around March 15, 2018, which was caused by acute closed melting angle.

1) From September 7, 2013 to September 1, 2013, the Defendant: (a) collected the Plaintiff’s approval document and insulting the Plaintiff; and (b) prevented the Defendant from attending the meeting at the time of reporting to the command division from October 2013; (c) around May 2014, the Defendant issued a physical impossible order to change the construction period from 74 days to 27 days with respect to the elevator replacement work; and (d) made a personal insult to the Plaintiff before the employees.

3. The plaintiff's qualification and qualification at the time of employment of an employee in charge of electricity around June 2014.

arrow