The defendant is innocent. The summary of this judgment shall be notified publicly.

1. The Defendant is a person who has served as the president of the Council for the Representatives of Apartment Residents in Gwangju Northern-gu, and the victim D.

On February 11, 2015, the Defendant had no fact that the Defendant was on the side of the guard room located between the 1 Dong Dong and 2 Dong Dong Dong Dong Dong Dong Dong Dong Dong Dong Dong Dong Dong Dong Dong Dong Dong Dong Dong Dong Dong Dong Dong Dong Dong Dong Dong Dong Dong Dong Dong Dong Dong Dong Dong Dong, but he was at the time of her her her her her her her her her her her her her her

By speaking, “the victim’s reputation was damaged by openly pointing out false facts.”

2. There is a statement in F’s investigative agencies and courts as direct evidence that seems consistent with the facts charged in the judgment.

However, the following circumstances revealed by the record, i.e., ① the Defendant, who is a registered director of a construction company, even when around 09:00 to 10:00 on February 11, 2015, at the time of attendance, is merely obligated to work and find the Defendant, the head of the management office, in light of logical and empirical rules, so it is difficult to easily understand in light of logical and empirical rules that it is difficult to easily understand that there is any other bad intent. ② The F stated that there was no fact in the investigative agency that there was no other victim on the part of the victim. However, the F stated that there was no fact that the victim on the part of the investigation agency did not appear (Evidence No. 90 pages), ③ the victim sent mobile phone contact frequently from February 7, 2015 to February 12, 2015, ③ the Defendant was not the victim’s representative, but rather the victim’s resignation and the victim’s withdrawal from office, and the Defendant did not dispute with the Counterterrorism Committee.