A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not less than eight months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for a period of two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

1. On August 28, 2017, the Defendant violated the Act on the Aggravated Punishment, etc. of Specific Crimes (Assault, etc. of Drivers) (hereinafter referred to as the “Defendant”), around 22:45, the Defendant opened a card terminal installed on the said taxi wing wing Sheet under the influence of alcohol at E-si operated by the victim D (51 years of age) who passed the road near the inside circulation road located in Seo-gu Seoul Metropolitan City 11-73, Seodaemun-gu, Seoul, Seoul, on his/her own on his/her own, around August 28, 2017, and prevented the victim from doing so.

“Absoning the victim’s hair with his hand and assaulting the victim’s hair.

Accordingly, the Defendant assaulted the driver of a vehicle in operation.

2. In order for the injured to find out the card terminal that the Defendant removed at the same time and place as indicated in the foregoing paragraph 1, the injured Defendant: (a) sealed the part of the victim’s head and the part of the victim’s head from the above taxi by arms; and (b) laid off the victim’s head and the part of the victim’s head by arms; and (c) on the part of the side part of the victim’s head and the part of the victim’s head by drinking, the injured Defendant spaceded the victim for about three weeks, and spaceded down the ples

3. The Defendant interferes with the performance of official duties at the same time and place as stated in the foregoing paragraph (1).

“A police officer who was arrested in the act of committing a crime for the foregoing reason to the police officer belonging to the Seoul Western Police Station Fabab, who was dispatched upon 112 report, and was waiting in the said police box for the foregoing reason, “Ye, Yeab, Yabab. White head Moba, and the death of the internal police officer.”

I am I am I am I am I am I am I am I am I am I am I am I am I am I am I am I am I am I am I am I am I am. I am I am I am I am I am I am I am I am I am I am I am I am I am I am I am I am I am I am I am I am I am I am I am I am

Accordingly, the defendant interfered with the legitimate execution of duties concerning the arrest of police officers in the act of crime and the maintenance of public order.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Each police statement made to D or G;

1.Each.