1. The judgment of the court of first instance is modified as follows.

Defendant 17,367,518 won, Plaintiff B, C, and D respectively. 3.

1. Occurrence of liability for damages;

A. The facts of recognition (1) around 07:50 on July 25, 2015, the Defendant driven the 3rd line road in the vicinity of the Hridge located in Busan FYG, without obtaining a driver's license, and was driving an I rocketing car (hereinafter "Defendant vehicle") under the influence of alcohol at 0.140% in the influence of alcohol at the 0.140% in the influence of alcohol level, and was under the influence of alcohol level at the head of Si/Gun/Gu (hereinafter "Defendant vehicle") and was under the influence of the head of Si/Gun/Gu, and was under the influence of the head of Si/Gun/Gu in the front of the traffic signal at the intersection. Upon receiving a report, the Defendant was dispatched to the Plaintiff, who is an inspector belonging to the Busan Coast Police Station in the Busan Coast Station, informing the Defendant's name and resident registration number to the Plaintiff, and responded to the measurement of the drinking reduction in the influence level by means of

(2) The Defendant, during the period of the suspension of the execution, was subject to the driver’s license for an interest during drinking so as to breath, Plaintiff A’s drinking reaction, and the Defendant boarded the Defendant’s seat, and reported that the Plaintiff opened a driver’s seat and carried the body in the Defendant’s vehicle and deducted the key of the vehicle, and the Plaintiff’s left-hand seat extends over the Defendant’s open seat, and the left-hand seat extends over the Defendant’s open seat. The left-hand bridge is on the road, the right-hand bridge is set up on the floor of the vehicle, and the right-hand bridge is cut down at a speed of about 37.7 km at a speed of about 51 km in speed at the speed of about 37.7 km at the front, while driving the vehicle parked on the front side to breath of Plaintiff A, sealed the Plaintiff’s engine out of the Defendant’s vehicle, and shock the front side of the Defendant’s front side of the traffic signal in the opposite direction at one-lane.

(3) Notwithstanding the above shock, the Defendant: (a) carried a driver’s seat window continuously opened by the Plaintiff A and carried it down at a speed of 92.1km per hour; (b) operated a section of approximately 179 meters per hour by diaging and driving it in the speed of 179 meters per hour; (c) re-driving over the center line, and (d) shocked the manual of heading 4-ho rail in front of the left side of the Defendant’s vehicle.