logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 수원지방법원 2017.04.25 2016나65787
소유권이전등기
Text

1. All appeals filed by the plaintiffs are dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal are assessed against the Plaintiffs.

The purport of the claim and appeal is the purport of the appeal.

Reasons

1. The reasoning of the judgment of this court cited in the judgment of the court of first instance is as stated in the reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance, except where the following is added to the end of “the judgment on the cause of second-party claims” among the grounds of the judgment of the court of first instance, and thus, it is acceptable in accordance with the main

2. Although the registration of the name of the defendant clan with respect to the forest of this case is valid, the part of the plaintiffs added claims that the registration of the name of the defendant clan is null and void due to the sale without a resolution of the legitimate clan general meeting of the defendant clan. Thus, even though there was no legitimate clan general meeting of the defendant clan with respect to the above sale and purchase, as long as the registration of the ownership transfer of the defendant clan was valid, the plaintiffs who lost their ownership to the forest of this case did not have the right to claim for cancellation of the registration by asserting the same reasons against the defendants who completed the registration of the ownership transfer from the defendant clan, so the above

3. In conclusion, the plaintiffs' claims should be dismissed in entirety due to the lack of reasonable grounds.

The judgment of the first instance is just in conclusion, and the plaintiffs' appeal is dismissed as it is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition by the assent of all participating Justices.

arrow