logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 광주지방법원 2017.03.08 2016고정2090 (1)
정보통신망이용촉진및정보보호등에관한법률위반(명예훼손)
Text

The sentence against the accused shall be determined by a fine of two million won.

If the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

The defendant is a person who uses the "B" as an clinic on the Internet NAV, etc.

1. The Defendant: (a) on September 20, 2016, on the 18:38 Snet (D) No. 18:38, 2016, “E this person’s c.

The title "the report on suspicion of fraud" is "E, F, G, 50 people's age, 180 people's age, M. M. M. M. M. M. M. M. M. M. M. M. M. M., which is good at the border.

H. A person who appropriates construction inducement, personnel expenses, etc. by making a false claim through an Internet car page, such as I car page, with direct contact and embezzlement. RV vehicles authorized as LV vehicles on the satisfe-cat-cat-cat-cat-cat-cat-cat-cat.

The Minister of General Affairs, the Vice-Minister, at the same time, claims for false personnel expenses, non-payment, and the form of punishment, and claims for overlapping personnel expenses and personnel expenses for daily occupation. He/she has filed a complaint with the Gwangju Northern Department on the charge of embezzlement, such as public funds and personnel expenses.

E is provided with data directly from workers and companies to submit evidence, such as the details of personnel expenses deposited by E to workers. The victim of No. 2 is the victim of No. 2.

Current Metropolitan City is being constructed in Gwangju Metropolitan City.

I.

The contents of "" were posted and a telegraphic photograph, including the victim's inner part, was posted.

2. On September 20, 2016, the Defendant posted a notice on the Internet Neneber “J” (K) on two occasions on September 20, 2016, 18:39, and 10:00, as described in paragraph (1).

3. On September 20, 2016, the Defendant posted the same content as paragraph (1) on the Internet four occasions, including 8:38, 217:30, 2016 September 21, 2016, and 2209:58, Sept. 22, 2016.

Accordingly, with the aim of slandering the Defendant, the Defendant posted a false fact openly through the information and communication network, thereby impairing the honor of the victim.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Statement made by the police for E;

1. Investigation report (verification of the results of dispositions in relevant cases) and decision-making and written opinion attached thereto;

1. Application of water-related Acts and subordinate statutes by capturing up a sign;

1. Relevant Articles of the Act concerning the facts constituting the crime;

arrow