(영문) 서울서부지방법원 2020.12.10 2020고정646

beta

본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.

Text

Reasons

텍스트 조절

글꼴

크기(pt)

굵기

줄 간격

자간(%)

(영문) 서울서부지방법원 2020.12.10 2020고정646

폭력행위등처벌에관한법률위반(공동재물손괴등)등

Text

Defendants shall be punished by a fine of KRW 700,000.

The Defendants did not pay each of the above fines.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

The Defendants are married and married, and the victims C (Nam and 61 years old) purchased rice for manufacturing rice for the purpose of processing rice for the purpose of purchasing rice for the purpose of processing rice for the purpose of processing rice for the purpose of processing rice for the purpose of processing rice for the purpose of processing rice for the purpose of processing rice for the purpose of processing rice for the purpose of processing rice for the purpose of processing rice for the purpose of processing rice for the purpose of processing rice for the purpose of processing rice for the purpose of processing rice for the purpose of processing rice for the purpose of processing rice for the same purpose

1. On February 3, 2020, the Defendants jointly destroyed the Seodaemun-gu Seoul Yongsan-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government (hereinafter “D”) with the victim and their children in the house where the victim and their children jointly live together, and jointly destroyed the opening and closing machine of the door amounting to KRW 200,000 for repair costs, on the ground that the victim did not move without opening the door. However, Defendant B, in front of the victim’s dwelling, jointly destroyed the door that “the rice value has been paid off,” and read the gate, which is closed with the Defendant, etc., on several occasions.

The written indictment contains 20,000 won, but it is obvious that it is a clerical error.

2. The Defendants jointly intruded upon the victim’s joint residence by destroying the opening door of the victim in the same manner as, at the time and place as, the date and place specified in paragraph (1) above, and opened the door to force. Defendant B without permission against the victim’s will through an open door, and Defendant A intruded around the entrance of the door, and thereby impairing the peace of the other person’s residence.

Based on the evidence submitted at the time, the Defendants’ act is corrected and recognized as criminal facts within the scope of the facts charged modified in this court.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendants’ partial statement

1. Statement of the police statement concerning C by witness C, G and H respective legal statements;

1. Each statement of H and G:

유사 판례

-대구지방법원 2013.02.15 2012고정323

-전주지방법원 군산지원 2013.04.26 2013고합11

-서울중앙지방법원 2012.07.25 2012고정1708

-전주지방법원 2012.11.15 2012고단2134

-대전지방법원 홍성지원 2017.03.14 2016고정263