1. All appeals filed by the Plaintiff (Counterclaim Defendant) are dismissed.

2. Payment of money in the part concerning a counterclaim by the court of first instance.

. It is more simple to seek the difference between the beginning date of the appraisal unit period ( March 16, 201) and the point at which the Defendant becomes able to file a claim for return of unjust enrichment ( November 2, 2011) by the method of a daily calculation, such as the No. 1 above table, as well as the amount is accurate;

Since then, the monthly rent shall be presumed to be the same amount unless there are special circumstances.

Results of the appraisal of rent: (1) 1.3 to 16.3 x 724 x 68.36 x 1.5 x 7.3 x 1.46 x 6.3 x 1.5 x 7.46 x 2.46 x 1.5 x 7.46 x 1.5 x 2.36 -6.36 - 6.36 - 16.46 - 6.3 - 6.5 - 6.3 - 6.4 - 6.5 - 6.3 - 6.16 - 6.15 - 6.3 - 6.4 - 6.5 - 16.3 - 6.5 - 16.4 - 7.4 5 - 16.15 - 7.4 ,2013

Therefore, the Plaintiff is obligated to pay to the Defendant the amount of money calculated by applying the rate of KRW 4,157,597 to KRW 72,760 per month from March 16, 201 to March 6, 2017, the sum of the rent of KRW 4,202,198, the sum of the rent of KRW 4,136,852, which the Defendant seeks from March 7, 2017 to March 15, 2017, and the rent of KRW 20,745, which the Plaintiff claimed from March 16, 2017 to March 16, 2017.

Thus, the plaintiff's main claim shall be dismissed as it is without merit, and the defendant's counterclaim shall be accepted within the scope of the above recognition, and the remainder of the counterclaim shall be dismissed as it is without merit.

In the judgment of the court of first instance, the part against the plaintiff's principal lawsuit and the part against the defendant's counterclaim removal and extradition request are concluded.