Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 3,000,000.

When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

Punishment of the crime

On January 24, 2016, the Defendant: (a) received a report from the head of the drinking house and the Si guard demanding the payment of the drinking value at the drinking house located in Jinju-si, Jinju-si, on January 24, 2016; and (b) received the report from the head of the drinking house and the head of the Si guard, “the person who was infected with the drinking house,” and was called “the person who was infected with the drinking house,” and called “the person who was injured with the drinking house,” and was called to be accompanied by the patrol vehicle to check the situation of the instant case,

At around 22:50 on the same day, the Defendant took a bath to the above E in order to help the Defendant getting off from the patrol vehicle at the above parking lot located in Jinju-si, and obstructed the police officer’s legitimate performance of duties concerning the handling of the reported case 112, considering the Defendant’s chest and her head twice.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Each police statement protocol with respect to G and E;

1. Application of the 112 Reporting Case Handling List, the Act and subordinate statutes governing the place of work;

1. Article 136 of the Criminal Act applicable to the crime, Article 136 (1) of the Criminal Act, the selection of fines, and the selection of fines;

1. Article 70(1) and Article 69(2) of the Criminal Act to attract a workhouse;

1. Although the reason for sentencing under Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act of the Criminal Procedure Act, the defendant assaults a police officer who was dispatched to his act of disturbance of drinking, the punishment as ordered shall be determined by taking into account the circumstances favorable to the defendant, such as the defendant's age, sexual behavior, etc., and other various factors of sentencing as shown in the records and theories of this case, such as the fact that the defendant's act of disturbance of drinking is against himself, that the police officer in question does not want the punishment of the defendant, that the police officer in question does not want the criminal punishment of the defendant, that the defendant does not have the same criminal history, and that there is no history of punishment other than the fine, etc.