Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 3,000,000.

When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

Punishment of the crime

1. Around 06:50 on July 2, 2016, the Defendant obstructed the performance of official duties, at Jinju-si, the Defendant: (a) arrived at G apartment, Ginju-si, where the Defendant was on the part of his employee who was under the influence of alcohol, and was on the part of Jinju-si, Police Station D District Unit E and F, for returning home with the Defendant, and was on the part of the patrol vehicle and was on the part of the police officer, and was on the part of the said F’s f’s f’s f’s f’s f’s f’s f’s f’s f’s f’s f’s f’s f’s f’s f’s f’s f’s f’s f’s f’s f’s f’s f’s f’s f’s f’s f’s f’s f’s f’

2. Around 07:00 on July 2, 2016, the Defendant, who damaged public goods, was demanded to leave the patrol car in front of the above G apartment, damaged goods used by public offices so that 33,000 won of the repair cost may be removed after opening the patrol car.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Each police statement made to E and F;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to photographs damaged for public use;

1. Article 136 (1) of the Criminal Act (the point of obstructing the performance of official duties) and Article 141 (1) of the Criminal Act concerning the facts constituting an offense (the point of impairing goods for public use) of the same Act;

1. Articles 40 and 50 of the Criminal Act of ordinary concurrent crimes (limited to cases where a person interferes with the execution of each official duty);

1. Selection of each alternative fine for punishment;

1. The former part of Article 37 of the Criminal Act, and Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the same Act, which aggravated concurrent crimes;

1. Article 70(1) and Article 69(2) of the Criminal Act to attract a workhouse;

1. Each of the crimes of this case where the defendant, on the grounds of sentencing of Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act with regard to the order of provisional payment, assaults the police officers dispatched to his principal act as a disturbance and damages patrol cars, the nature of the crime is not good.

However, the fact that the defendant reflects his criminal act, the defendant committed deep-depth death against the police officer, and the police officer did not want to punish the defendant, he compensated for the repair cost of the patrol car, and the defendant did not want to do so.