The judgment below

The part concerning Defendant B shall be reversed.

Defendant

B A person shall be punished by imprisonment for one year.

except that this judgment.

1. Summary of grounds for appeal;

A. It is unfair that the sentence of the lower judgment against the Defendants by the prosecutor (two years of imprisonment, one year of imprisonment, one year of suspended execution, two years of suspended execution, etc.) is too unhued and unfair.

B. The sentence of the lower judgment against Defendant A is too unreasonable.

2. Determination on the grounds for appeal

A. Defendant A received a summary order of KRW 5 million on February 13, 2013 due to the crime that acquired three mobile phones, a stolen on or around September 2012. Defendant A: (a) from around January 18, 2013 during the investigation and trial process, Defendant A advertised that he purchased the lost or acquired mobile phones; (b) Defendant A advertised that he purchased the lost or acquired mobile phones; (c) the act of acquiring the lost or acquired mobile phones in mind is not only illegal acts, but also the same crime is not good considering the fact that it appears to be a large number of stolen goods; and (d) there is an organization that purchased the mobile phones, such as Defendant A, which is an organization that purchased the mobile phones, and in particular, where smartphone was lost, there is no need to punish Defendant A’s mobile phones from a very large amount of mental damage to the mobile phone without any justifiable reason for Defendant A’s use of the mobile phone information, and thus, Defendant A’s assertion that his mobile phone was excessively stolen or lost due to considerable mental damage to the mobile phone.

However, Defendant A provided purchase funds to subordinate officers in advance.