1. The plaintiff's claim is dismissed.

2. The costs of the lawsuit, including costs incurred by participation, are all assessed against the Plaintiff.

The plaintiff is a company established on May 24, 201 and employs 70 full-time workers, with the purpose of manufacturing functional health foods.

On February 26, 2014, the Intervenor joining the Intervenor (hereinafter referred to as the “ Intervenor”) started to serve as the “IR” and the head of the marketing team responsible for the relationship with investors by joining the Plaintiff Company.

On May 19, 2014, the Plaintiff changed the position of the Intervenor to “the International R Team leader” to “the head of the Planning Office C,” thereby concentrating only the duties of international R except marketing. On June 30, 2014, the Plaintiff deprived the Intervenor of the position of the Intervenor’s team leader by transferring the Intervenor to the deputy head of the Planning Office.

Plaintiff

On July 1, 2014, the employees D requested the Intervenor to withdraw from the “group Kakao Stockholm” dialogue, which is part of the employees of the Plaintiff Company, in relation to the sale of the product, but the Intervenor did not comply with the request, but ordered the Intervenor to withdraw from the said organization Kakao Stockholm by means of securing the Intervenor’s handphones.

E, by pressureing the Intervenor or the Intervenor to temporarily use the Intervenor’s Handphones, the Intervenor took advantage of or prevented the Intervenor from taking advantage of his or her Handphones, and the Intervenor went away from the morning’s workplace on the same day on the same day.

Plaintiff

On July 1, 2014, in order to refer the intervenor to the Disciplinary Committee, the company issued a standby order to wait for the intervenor at the call center of the plaintiff company. The intervenor transferred the intervenor's goods to the table dog of the plaintiff company (the employees of the plaintiff company have kept pet dogs raised by them during working hours).

The intervenor returned to the plaintiff company at around 17:00 on the same day and brought personal belongings and did not work after the publication.

The plaintiff on July 1, 2014 and the same month for the intervenors.

3. A notice of the attendance at the personnel committee to be held.