logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울행정법원 2016.01.21 2015구합6927
부당정직구제재심판정취소
Text

1. The plaintiff's claim is dismissed.

2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff, including the part resulting from the supplementary participation.

Reasons

1. Details of the decision on retrial;

A. A Co., Ltd. (hereinafter “instant company”) ordinarily employs 60 workers and manufactures and sells black boxes for vehicles, and was decided to commence the rehabilitation procedure on June 26, 2015.

The intervenor entered the company of this case on September 23, 2013.

B. On November 3, 2014, the instant company held a disciplinary committee for disciplinary action against a participant (Article 14 subparagraph 2 of the Rules of Employment) (the Personnel Committee appears to have held a disciplinary committee for disciplinary action against a participant; hereinafter “instant disciplinary committee”) under the name of the disciplinary committee to punish a participant on November 3, 2014 (Article 14 subparagraph 2 of the Rules of Employment) and conducted speech and behavior that could interfere with the training course of a participant (hereinafter “Disciplinary Reason 1”) (hereinafter “Disciplinary Reason 1”), and ② the Vice-GovernorD, without the consent of the intervenor’s consent, submitted a new statement of reasons for the issuance of the health insurance qualification certificate to the participant on four occasions, and failed to comply with the direction of the above intervenor (hereinafter “Disciplinary Reason 2”), ③ The instant company’s seizure and seizure without the consent of the Intervenor’s 35 copies of the instant document and without the consent of the Intervenor’s 35 copies of the instant document.

(hereinafter referred to as “Disciplinary Reason 3” means nine grounds for disciplinary action, including the grounds for disciplinary action, to which the intervenor was subject to suspension from office for two months, and to which the intervenor was notified on November 4, 2014.

(hereinafter “instant suspension from office”). C.

An intervenor shall submit this case to the Gyeonggi Regional Labor Relations Commission on December 22, 2014.

arrow