A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not less than one year and six months.

Punishment of the crime

On October 14, 2015, the Defendant was sentenced to one year to imprisonment with prison labor for intimidation, etc. in the Suwon Franchisive Training Center on May 16, 2016. On July 25, 2012, the Defendant was sentenced to imprisonment with prison labor for larceny, etc., and the execution of the sentence was completed on June 25, 2014 (the same sentence was sentenced in the review on July 7, 2016), and on February 10, 2017, the Defendant was under suspension of the appellate trial after being sentenced to imprisonment with prison labor for a special larceny, etc. by the Seoul Central District Court on February 10, 2017.

On December 2, 2016, the Defendant, at the Defendant’s home located in the 19:41 Simsan-si, 102, posted a letter stating that the Internet portal site No. 7 is printed by a telephone call No. 10 to a foreign car page, and made a false statement stating that “If sending KRW 700,000 to the Defendant, I will send Aphone 7,000.”

However, as the defendant did not have 7 mobilephones, there was no intention or ability to send them even if he received sales proceeds from the injured party.

Nevertheless, the Defendant: (a) received 700,000 won from the injured party, namely, the money from the victim to the Defendant’s account (T) under the name of the Defendant for the sales proceeds of 7 mobilephones; (b) and (c) received a total of KRW 4,945,00 from around that time to December 19, 2016 by means of the same manner as indicated in the list of crimes in attached Form 11 in the same manner as indicated in the list of crimes.

"2017 Highest 1425"

1. On December 7, 2016, the Defendant, at around 17:34, 2016, posted a letter “S7 when gallon gallon gallon” on the “gallon gallon gallon” bulletin board, a smartphone, at the Defendant’s residence located in 102, stating that the Defendant would send S7 when gallon gallon gallon to the Defendant who reported and contacted the above letter “450,000 won to the Defendant.”

However, it is true.