A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for six months.

However, the execution of the above sentence shall be suspended for a period of two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

On August 26, 2017, the Defendant, while drinking in the vicinity of D E, in light of 02:35 on August 26, 2017, was asked to access E, a police officer of the light name police station, who was dispatched after receiving the report of the above E- 112, to F (32 tax) who was the police officer of the light name police station, called “B” and “B”.

"Abdoing so sound, the chest part of the above police officer's chest was pushed, was towed by his hand, and the above police officer tried to board the patrol vehicle, and obstructed the above police officer from getting on the driver's seat or not to shut down the door of the driver's seat in the vicinity of the patrol vehicle and preventing the police officer from getting on the driver's seat or close the driver's seat.

As a result, the Defendant interfered with the legitimate execution of duties of police officers concerning the handling of 112 reports.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Application of the law of the police statement protocol to F;

1. Relevant Article 136 of the Criminal Act concerning the facts constituting an offense and Article 136 (1) of the Criminal Act concerning the selection of punishment;

1. It is so decided as per Disposition on the grounds of Article 62(1) of the Criminal Act or more (i.e., the facts charged, the degree of violence, etc.);