Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 5,000,000.

If the defendant does not pay the above fine, 50,000 won.

Punishment of the crime

The Defendant is a person who runs a new import business under the trade name "C" in Mapo-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government building 402.

No person shall use a trademark identical with the registered trademark of another person for goods similar to the designated goods or use a trademark similar to the registered trademark on goods identical with or similar to the designated goods

그럼에도 불구하고 피고인은 2012. 9.경 중국 위해에서 중국인 직원인 D에게 지시하여 선물용으로 상표권자 샤넬의 등록상표(등록번호 제0056673호)와 같은 모양의 위조상표가 부착된 목도리 6점 등 별지 범죄일람표에 기재된 상표권자들의 등록상표와 같은 모양의 위조상표가 부착된 핸드백 80점, 코트 16점, 목도리 6점, 스카프 3점, 신발 6점, 쿠션커버 16점, 넥타이 6점 총 133점(현지구입시가 100만 원, 정품추정시가 1억 1,810만 원)을 구입하고, 이를 2012. 9. 24. 인천항에서 선박을 통해 수입하였다.

Accordingly, the defendant imported counterfeit goods for the purpose of delivering them, and infringed on trademark rights of trademark owners.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Seizure records;

1. The application of Acts and subordinate statutes to an accusation, a written accusation, a report on detection, a photographic material, a printed material for inquiry about imported cargo tracking information, a bill of lading, invoice, packing statement, a statement of actualization, a certificate of realization, a trademark appraisal, a copy of the trademark register, a list of reported goods appraisal values, a list of combined cargo lists, a printed material for detailed inquiry about the details of the cargo list, a photograph of stolen goods and an appraisal

1. Relevant Article of the Trademark Act and Article 93 (Joint Application by Registered Trademark) of the Trademark Act regarding facts constituting an offense, and selection of fines, respectively;

1. Of concurrent crimes, the former part of Article 37, Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the Criminal Act;

1. Articles 70 and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;

1. The reason for sentencing of Article 97-2(1) of the Trademark Act is against the defendant, and the defendant does not have the same criminal record and imported by the defendant.