logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 수원지방법원안산지원 2020.11.27 2020고단3866
상해등
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment with prison labor for not more than ten months and a fine not exceeding 600,000 won.

However, the above imprisonment for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

1. At around 21:40 on March 28, 2020, the injured Defendant contacted the victim D (Nam, 57 years of age) who was drinking alcohol at the main point of the Yagu, Ansan-si B and the 1st floor “C”, and sought the victim's face, ear back, and back back to the floor of the gate without any particular reason, and continued to see the victim's face, face, head, and body part of the victim's body in front of the above main point, and continued to see the victim's face, head, and body part of the victim's body by drinking and spath from the road above the above main point, and caused the victim's injury, such as subleting 1 balance of the right side for about 4 weeks of treatment.

2. When the Defendant was arrested in flagrant offender for the same reason as stated in paragraph (1), on March 28, 2020, the Defendant was drunk at the Ma and F District Office in Ansan-si, Ansan-si on March 28, 2020, and, under the influence of alcohol, the Defendant was drunkly or imprisoned by a very good citizen, who is a police officer, as to whether he would have been able to carry out the tasks of bitb chp chp chp chp chp chp chp chp chp chp chp chp chp chp chp chp chp chp chp chp chp chp chp chp chp chp chp, and even has taxed well.

3. At around 22:55 on March 28, 2020, the Defendant engaged in obstruction of performance of official duties, at the Fdistrict office as indicated in paragraph (2) around 22:3, 2020, the Defendant was seated with the body of Gman in order to prevent the Defendant from engaging in an act of disturbance or disturbance, and the Defendant was seated with the right-math part of Gman with the right-hand part of G in order to keep the Defendant from committing an act of disturbance or disturbance.

Accordingly, the defendant interfered with the legitimate execution of police officers' duties in suppression of crimes.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Report on internal investigation by the police on D and G, and the site photograph of the case;

1. CCTV image data at the site of the case;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes of each injury diagnosis letter;

1. Relevant Articles of the Act and punishment concerning the facts constituting the crime;

arrow