The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

1. The lower court’s punishment (one year and two months of imprisonment) against the accused against the summary of the grounds for appeal is too unreasonable.

2. Although the circumstances favorable to the defendant are partially recognized, such as the fact that the defendant recognized all of the crimes and reflects on the fact that the defendant committed the crime, the victims of the non-paid case at hospital expenses and the victim F, and the fact that there was no record of having been sentenced to punishment or imprisonment without prison labor or any heavier punishment for the same kind of crime, the above favorable circumstances appear to have been reflected in the court below. The above favorable circumstances appear to have already been reflected in the court below, the victim's failure to reach an agreement with the victim C who suffered the largest damage or to restore the damage to the above victim, and it does not seem to have shown that the above victim was able to suffer severe punishment against the defendant, and the defendant sent a letter of intimidation to the victim C while the defendant was detained. In light of the method of each of the crimes of this case, the nature of the crime was very poor when considering the defendant's method of the crime of this case, the defendant's behavior and character, environment, family relationship, etc. that the defendant was seen to have been seen to be too unfair.

3. In conclusion, the defendant's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act since it is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.