The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

1. The sentence of the court below against the defendant in the summary of the grounds for appeal is too unreasonable.

2. The circumstances favorable to the defendant are partially recognized, such as the fact that the defendant recognized all of the crimes, the fact that there was no record of having been sentenced to imprisonment without prison labor or heavier punishment before the crime of this case was committed, and the fact that there was ex post concurrent crimes with the crime of occupational embezzlement, etc. finalized on October 24, 2014. However, the above favorable circumstances appear to have already been reflected in the court below, and this case has already been obtained benefits by using the victim’s fiduciary relationship with the victim C, and it is not very good in the nature of the crime, and it is still not clear that the crime has been committed, as well as the fact that the victim did not have agreed with the victims or did not have paid any damage to the victims, and other circumstances constituting the conditions for the sentencing of the case, such as the defendant’s age, character and behavior, environment, family relationship, circumstance after the crime, etc., it is not recognized that the court below’s punishment is too unreasonable. Thus, the defendant and

3. In conclusion, the defendant's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act on the ground that the defendant's appeal is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.