logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 부산고등법원(창원) 2016.09.29 2014나21031
대여금
Text

1. The part against the Defendants in the judgment of the court of first instance is revoked, and the Plaintiff falls under the above revoked part.

Reasons

1. Basic facts

A. A promotion committee for the establishment of a housing redevelopment and rearrangement project (hereinafter “instant promotion committee”) consists of 174,01 square meters in Msan-si to establish an association to implement a rearrangement project under the Act on the Maintenance and Improvement of Urban Areas and Dwelling Conditions for Residents (hereinafter “instant rearrangement project”). On May 22, 2006, the committee obtained approval for establishment from Msan-si market as of May 2, 2006. On July 2, 2008, the designation of a rearrangement zone was made because the external smoke was partially expanded in the center of the originally scheduled project area, and the name of Msan-si City Mayor at the time of the designation of the rearrangement zone was “A District Housing Redevelopment and Rearrangement Projects Promotion Committee for the Establishment of Urban Environment Rearrangement and Rearrangement Projects,” and the Zsan-si 214,234 square meters in Msan-si.

B. On August 22, 2006, the promotion committee of this case decided to select the plaintiff as the operator of the business of this case at the residents' general meeting, and on September 26, 2006, entered into a contract with the plaintiff (hereinafter "the contract of this case"). Defendant B, C, D, E, G, H, I, J, J, K, L, M,O, P, P, and network X and network Y (hereinafter "the promotion committee of this case") as the promotion member of the promotion committee of this case, jointly and severally guaranteed the obligation of the promotion committee of this case to the plaintiff of this case under the contract of this case. The contract of this case includes the contents related to monetary loan.

C. In accordance with the instant contract, the Plaintiff lent money under the name of the instant promotion committee, such as partnership operation expenses, to the said committee as indicated below.

(hereinafter “The instant loan”). The loan’s loan’s loan’s loan’s loan’s loan’s loan’s loan’s loan’s No. 287,084,200 No. 2-1,22 of the business expenses as of September 26, 2006 (in December 7, 2006, 9,10,1000 U.S. No. 3, No. 4, No. 3, No. 500,000 for the traffic impact assessment service’s loan’s loan’s loan’s loan’s loan’s loan’s loan’s loan’s loan’s loan’s loan’s loan’s loan’s No. 5, No. 500,000 for the 5,50,000 for the 4-designated loan’s loan’s loan’s loan’s loan’s loan’s 287,006.

arrow