logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울중앙지방법원 2017.09.14 2017가단5067106
공제금 등 청구의 소
Text

1. The Defendant: (a) KRW 9,00,00 for Plaintiff A; and (b) KRW 10,500,000 for Plaintiff B; and (c) for each of them, from June 11, 2017 to September 2017.

Reasons

1. Facts of recognition;

A. On August 4, 2015, Plaintiff A entered into a lease agreement between E and the owner of the multi-family house located in Seongdong-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government (hereinafter “instant multi-family house”) with respect to the instant multi-family house (hereinafter “instant multi-family house”) 702, which is the owner of the multi-family house located in Seongdong-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government, with the lease deposit of KRW 55 million, from September 4, 2015 to September 3, 2017. On September 4, 2015, Plaintiff B entered into the lease agreement with the full payment of the deposit and occupied the said deposit, and obtained the move-in report and the fixed date on September 21, 2015. 2) on August 31, 2015, Plaintiff B entered into the lease agreement with E and completed the move-in report from September 14, 2015 to September 25, 2015.

B. 1) The act of brokerage of licensed real estate agents and the conclusion of a mutual aid agreement is a licensed real estate agent running the G Licensed Real Estate Agent Office and F are licensed real estate agents operating the H Licensed Real Estate Agent Office. According to the confirmation and explanatory note of each of the above licensed real estate agents at the time of entering into each of the above lease agreements (the above two lease agreements collectively referred to as the "each of the instant lease agreements") and delivered to the Plaintiffs, the term "matters of rights other than ownership" includes each of the maximum debt amount of 1.2 billion won (the National Bank of the mortgagee) and 312 million won (the non-deposit bank of the mortgagee), but the term "matters of rights other than the actual relation of rights" did not state any of the following. Meanwhile, if the above licensed real estate agents caused property damage to the parties to a transaction by intention or negligence while acting as a real estate broker, the Defendant shall compensate for the damage within the limit of 100 million won.

arrow