A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for six months.

However, the execution of the above sentence shall be suspended for a period of one year from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

On August 20, 2017, at around 04:40, the Defendant: (a) on the street in front of the DNA conference located in Busan coastal Organization C, the Defendant was unable to operate the patrol car by opening the front door of the driver’s seat and the front door to prevent the Defendant from getting out of the patrol car, who was called out after receiving a report from the 112 that the Defendant was going to go out without going through the large time.

Accordingly, the F does not interfere with the Defendant’s operation of patrols from the patrols.

The Defendant of warning defects assaulted the F on one occasion by drinking the right shoulder of F, putting the f’s clothes in hand, putting the f’s clothes in hand.

Accordingly, the defendant interfered with legitimate execution of duties by police officers' patrol activities.

Summary of Evidence

1. Partial statement of the defendant;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes on police statements made to G and F;

1. Relevant Article 136 (1) of the Criminal Act, the choice of punishment for the crime, and the choice of imprisonment;

2. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act on the stay of execution of a public duty (it shall be considered that there exists any past record of punishment for a police officer who takes a bath for the performance of a public duty, or that the degree of interference with the performance of a public duty is relatively minor, and that there is a reflective nature.)