A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for six months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for a period of two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

Around 14:45 on July 25, 2015, the Defendant: (a) expressed the desire to leave the scene to remove the police officer from the scene, and (b) expressed the desire to “I am sarbling, I am sarbling, I am sarbling, I am sarbling, I am sarbling, I am sarbling, I am sarbling, I am sarbling, I am sarbling, I am sarbling, I am sarbling, I am sarbling, I am sarbling, I am sarbling, I am sarbling, I am sarbling, I am sarbling, I ambling, etc. in the vicinity of the Defendant.”

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Application of the F and E respective Acts and subordinate statutes;

1. Article 136 (1) of the Criminal Act applicable to the facts constituting an offense;

1. Articles 40 and 50 of the Criminal Act (Supreme Court Decision 2009Do3505 Decided June 25, 2009)

1. Imprisonment with prison labor chosen;

1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act on the suspended execution;

1. A person whose sentencing under Article 62-2 of the Social Service Criminal Act is a person who obstructs the execution of public duties in 1st to 6th to 1st to 4th year from August of the basic aggravation of the classification of types of crimes: A sentence of recommending aggravated factors (not falling under any of the aggravated factors): A sentence of imprisonment in the aggravated area (one to four years): A sentence of ten months: A sentence of imprisonment in the aggravated area: A sentence of six months: a suspended sentence of six months; a person who provides community service for 40 hours aggravated: A person who was mitigated by committing a crime against the auxiliary police officer who was patrol: A confession, absence of the same criminal records, etc.;