1. The plaintiff's appeal is dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

The purport of the claim and appeal is the purport of the appeal.

1. Basic facts

A. As to the Plaintiff’s vehicle C (hereinafter “Plaintiff’s vehicle”), the Defendant is the insurer who concluded each automobile insurance contract with respect to D vehicles (hereinafter “Defendant’s vehicle”).

B. On August 22, 2017, the Plaintiff’s vehicle was proceeding in the direction of the intersection in the direction of the intersection while driving a three-lane of the three-lane road near the health zone in the Han-dong, Seo-dong, Sinsu-dong, Nam-dong, and the direction of the intersection. The Defendant’s vehicle driven the two-lane of the three-lane road behind the Plaintiff’s vehicle while driving the two-lane of the three-lane road in the rear side of the Plaintiff’s vehicle and driving the vehicle as the right of intersection.

Plaintiff

On the three-lanes of the point where the vehicle and the defendant vehicle pass through the intersection, there was an accident of collision between the front side of the plaintiff vehicle and the right side of the defendant vehicle.

(hereinafter “instant accident”). The roads of the said three-lanes are the roads with two-lanes passing along the intersection as follows:

C. On September 28, 2017, the Plaintiff paid KRW 1,516,700 at the repair cost of the Plaintiff’s vehicle.

(Exclusion of Self-Payment Amounting to KRW 378,00). [Reasons for Recognition] / [Grounds for Recognition] / The fact that there is no dispute, Gap evidence 1 through 9, and the purport of the whole entries and arguments in Gap evidence 2 through 7, and the purport of

2. Determination on the cause of the claim

A. The plaintiff asserted that the accident of this case occurred by changing the vehicle line from the intersection where the defendant vehicle is prohibited from changing course. However, according to the above facts and each of the above evidence, the accident of this case is caused by the negligence of changing the vehicle line from the three lanes to the two lanes after passing through the intersection, and the vehicle of this case driving in the two lanes to the two lanes, while passing through the intersection, while passing through the intersection, while the vehicle of this case driving in the three lanes to the two lanes. However, the accident of this case is caused by the negligence of changing the two lanes from the three lanes to the two lanes.

§ 19. The Road Traffic Act