1. The Defendant: (a) 69,200,000 won to Plaintiff A; (b) 21,50,000 won to Plaintiff B; (c) 43,240,000 won to Plaintiff C; and (d) the Plaintiff Company.

1. Basic facts

A. The Defendant decided to newly construct a multi-household housing located in Guro-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government and H (hereinafter “instant housing”) and concluded an implementation agency contract with I and J around June 22, 2012 as follows.

(B) Under the following contract, “A” and “B” refer to both I and J, respectively. 1. B must first pay the land cost of one billion won to “A” after selling in lots.

5. A shall refer to all activities relating to construction (design, sale in lots, selection of a contractor, etc.) to B.

6. A shall be the key to provide B with a written consent to land use which is required at the time of authorization or permission.

7.A shall cooperate to the maximum extent possible at the request of any real estate-related document that is required in the course of performing its functions.

B. As to the new construction of the instant housing, J concluded, in the name of the Defendant, the construction contract with the Plaintiff A and the main household, the construction contract with the Plaintiff B, in the remote area and the strengthening floor, the construction contract with the Plaintiff C and the fire doors, the construction contract with the Plaintiff, the building contract with the Plaintiff, the building contract with the Plaintiff, the building contract with the Plaintiff, the building contract with the Plaintiff D and the literature construction contract, and the Plaintiff E, respectively

(hereinafter “each of the instant construction contracts”) C.

The Plaintiffs completed construction works under each of the instant construction contracts.

The construction cost that the Plaintiffs did not receive from the Defendant even after completion of the construction work is KRW 69,20,000 in the case of Plaintiff A, KRW 21,50,00 in the case of Plaintiff B, KRW 43,240,00 in the case of Plaintiff C, KRW 16,50,00 in the case of Plaintiff C, KRW 12,776,00 in the case of Plaintiff D, KRW 12,776,00 in the case of Plaintiff E, and KRW 8,50,00 in the case of Plaintiff E.

[Ground of recognition] Facts without dispute, entry of Gap 1 to 8 evidence (including each number), the purport of the whole pleadings

2. According to the facts of recognition as to the plaintiffs' claims, it is reasonable to view that J concluded each of the instant construction contracts with the plaintiffs under the name of the defendant upon delegation by the defendant of all of the authority pertaining to the new construction of the instant house.

For this reason, the defendant's seal impression is the defendant.