beta
Text
A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not less than eight months.
Reasons
Punishment of the crime
On November 17, 2016, the Defendant was sentenced to imprisonment for a violation of road traffic law in the support for the safeness of the method of flood control, etc. on November 17, 2016, and was sentenced to two years of suspension of execution for August 25, 2016, which became final and conclusive on November 25, 2016.
1. On October 21, 2009, the Defendant issued a summary order of KRW 2,00,000,000 to a fine of KRW 1,000 for a violation of the Road Traffic Act (drinking) in the support for the safe flow of water sources and in child delivery, on November 17, 2016, the Defendant was sentenced to the suspension of the execution of eight months for the same crime in the same court on November 30, 2016. On November 30, 2016, the Defendant was sentenced to a fine of KRW 5,00,000 for the same crime and violated Article 44 (1) of the Road Traffic Act twice or more, and the Defendant was sentenced to a fine of KRW 5,00,00 for the same crime and violated Article 44 (1) of the Road Traffic Act on March 23, 2017.
2. Around 10:37 of the same day, the Defendant: (a) driven as stated in the foregoing paragraph 1 at the 11th Yandong-ro 11, Annsan-ro, Annsan-si, Annsan-si, Annsan-ro 11 on the same day; (b) controlled by D police officers of the 11st Y; (c) decided to perform his/her duties; (d) signed an individual portable information device (PDA) connected to the transportation police computer network from the above D as “E” without authority for the purpose of exercising the Defendant’s signature on the Defendant’s signature column; and (d) forged the above B’s signature on the said device without authority for the purpose of exercising the Defendant’s signature on the Defendant’s signature request; and (e) presented it to the said police officers without knowledge that the signature of the E
3. The Defendant, at the time and place specified in the foregoing paragraph 2, committed the act of forging a private document or uttering of the pertinent investigation document, with the intent of having the Defendant conduct the E’s happiness as stated in the foregoing paragraph 2, and responded to D’s voluntary request for accompanying, and the Defendant voluntarily consented to the request of D’s voluntary accompanying.