logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 수원지방법원 안산지원 2016.01.21 2015고단3723
사서명위조등
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not more than ten months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for a period of two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

On September 7, 2012, the Defendant was issued a summary order of a fine of three million won for a crime of violating the Road Traffic Act (drinking driving) at the Jung-gu District Court on September 7, 2012, and was sentenced to a fine of five million won for the same crime on October 19, 2015.

1. On November 29, 2015, the Defendant violated the Road Traffic Act (drinking) and the Road Traffic Act (dless Driving) and the Automobile Compensation Guarantee Act (divated Driving) and the Defendant driving a C M& car not covered by mandatory insurance without obtaining a driver’s license from a 100-meter section of approximately 100 meters from a Do in front of the reputation-ro 78 (Ethodong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-ro 90 meters from a Do in front of the reputation-ro 17:19 on November 29, 2015, without obtaining a driver’s license.

2. The Defendant forged a private signature and signed the above investigation at the same time, at the same time, and at the same place, when the police officer belonging to the police box No. 1 of the Ansan Police Station, controlled driving of alcohol, the Defendant sent the pertinent system with the signature of “D” on the personal information device (PDA), which was prepared in accordance with D’s personal information that was used by the police officer as above, to control driving of alcohol, and sent it to the pertinent police officer, as if the signature was genuine, as if the above forged signature was issued to the above police officer who knew of the forgery was genuine.

Accordingly, the defendant, for the purpose of exercising authority, forged the signature of D without authority, and exercised it.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Statement made by the police for E;

1. Report on the circumstances of driving under the liquor:

1. Notice of the result of crackdown on driving drinking;

1. The driver's license ledger;

1. Inquiries about mandatory insurance and inquiries about non- mandatory insurance information;

1. Photographs related to the case;

1. Previous convictions in judgment: Application of a reply to inquiry, such as criminal history, (A) and Acts and subordinate statutes;

1. The Road Traffic Act applicable to criminal facts;

arrow