1. The plaintiff's claim is dismissed.

2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

1. Details of the disposition;

A. The Plaintiff’s husband B (C) was appointed from the Jeonnam-do Fire Station to E on August 7, 1981 and served as fire-fighting officials in a fire station, etc. within the jurisdiction from January 19, 201 to the Safety and Security Organization in Seoul (hereinafter “instant Organizing Committee”) and was dispatched from January 19, 201 to the Safety and Security Organization in Seoul (hereinafter “the instant Organizing Committee”), and was provided medical treatment at the Gneology from March 18, 201 to April 2, 201 due to depression, etc. during which he/she was in charge of duties as a disaster-prevention official, at the Gneology medical branch from March 28, 2011 and from the Seoul National University Hospital from April 5, 2011 to May 7, 2011, and from the Jeonnam University Hospital from May 17, 2011 to the same month.

B. On April 1, 201, when the Plaintiff was assigned to the Organizing Committee, the Plaintiff committed suicide on the trees located behind the J apartment at the time of innish-si on May 25, 201, when he was under hospital treatment for treatment, such as depression, after having been assigned to I by the Jeonnam-do Fire Headquarters of the Republic of Korea as an I of the fire headquarters of the Republic of Korea, and transferred the workplace to a wooden prisoner of war, and was under hospital treatment.

C. Around May 2012, the Plaintiff applied for approval of the medical care for official duties on the part of the Defendant on the ground that the “competence caused by high-level stress” against the deceased B (hereinafter “the deceased”). However, following deliberation by the Public Official Pension Benefit Deliberation Committee, the Defendant rendered a decision not to grant medical care for official duties on June 1, 2012 on the ground that “it is difficult to deem that there is a considerable causal relationship between the applicant branch and the official duties.”

(hereinafter “Disposition of this case”). 【Disposition of this case’s ground for recognition of this case’s existence of no dispute, Gap’s 1 through 3, Eul’s 1, and the purport of the whole pleadings.

2. Whether the instant disposition is lawful

A. From August 1981, 1981, the Plaintiff asserted that he was employed as E in the Do Fire Station of Jeonnam-do, and from the end of 2010, the fire station located within the jurisdiction mainly carried out the duties of fire officers, such as fire, rescue and first aid, and public services. On January 19, 2011, the Plaintiff was issued as the safety team of the Organizing Committee in Seoul, where he did not want the Deceased.