1. Revocation of the first instance judgment.

2. On August 31, 2012, the Defendant’s compensation for survivors’ compensation for the Plaintiff.

1. Details of the disposition;

A. On May 25, 2011, the Plaintiff’s husband B (hereinafter “the Plaintiff’s husband”) served as a fire-fighting official. From April 6, 201, the Plaintiff committed suicide by putting trees on the trees located behind the H apartment-ro in the G apartment-ro, in order to provide medical treatment, such as depression.

B. On June 2012, the Plaintiff requested the Defendant to pay compensation for bereaved families on the ground that the death of the deceased was due to depression caused by mental stress arising from his/her duties, and constitutes an occupational accident.

C. On August 31, 2012, after deliberation by the Public Official Pension Benefit Council, the Defendant rendered a decision on site payment on the ground that “Generally, in the case of suicide, the personal decision called the resolution and implementation of suicide is an accident by intentional or private act unrelated to the performance of official duties. Also, rather than the occurrence or the existing disease has been significantly aggravated, it is considered as a result of an internal and external factor such as a climatic person who was in a sensitive reaction to stress, or was caused by the growth process, etc., and it is difficult to view that the deceased died in a extreme loss or mental state due to the occupational reason. As such, the deceased’s death cannot be deemed as a result of a private act unrelated to the intentional act or official duty, and thus, it is difficult to deem that there is a substantial causal relationship with the deceased’s official duty or official duty.”

(hereinafter “instant disposition”). 【The ground for recognition】 The fact that there is no dispute, Gap’s 1 through 3, Eul’s 1 (including a dive number that does not indicate any of the serial numbers; hereinafter the same shall apply), the purport of the entire pleadings.

2. Whether the instant disposition is lawful

A. The gist of the Plaintiff’s assertion is that the fire department within the jurisdiction, including fire rescue and emergency squad civil service, after being appointed as E.