Text
1. The plaintiff's claim is dismissed.
2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.
Reasons
1. The Plaintiff is a woman of Mongolian nationality.
On March 10, 2014, the Plaintiff first entered the Republic of Korea as a general training (D-4) sojourn status on March 6, 2015, and applied for the extension of sojourn period on September 21, 2017, when the Plaintiff was enrolled in two Won National University B with the permission for change of sojourn status on March 6, 2015.
B. On November 23, 2017, the Defendant rendered a provisional decision to refuse the extension of the period of stay (hereinafter “instant disposition”) pursuant to Article 33 of the Enforcement Decree of the Immigration Control Act on the ground that the Plaintiff’s failure to satisfy the requirements, etc. was the Plaintiff.
【Facts without dispute over the grounds for recognition】 non-contentious facts, Gap evidence Nos. 1 through 5, Eul evidence Nos. 1 and 2, and the purport of whole pleadings
2. If a foreigner staying in the Republic of Korea wishes to engage in activities that fall under the status of sojourn different from his/her status of sojourn, a permit to change his/her status of sojourn shall be obtained in advance (Article 24(1) of the Immigration Control Act); if a foreigner intends to continue his/her sojourn in excess of the period of sojourn, he/she shall obtain the permission to extend the period of sojourn before the period of sojourn expires (Article 25 of the Immigration Control Act); if such permission
(Article 33(1) of the Enforcement Decree of the Immigration Control Act (Article 33(1) of the Enforcement Decree of the Immigration Control Act). The status of stay in Korea (D-2) is granted to a person who falls under the status of stay (D-2) or who intends to receive a regular course or to conduct a specific research at an educational institution or academic research institute of study (D-2) or higher than a junior college (D-2) on November, 11. (Article 10 of the Immigration Control Act and attached Table 12 of the Enforcement Decree of the same Act). According to Article 31(1) of the Enforcement Decree of the Immigration Control Act and Article 76(2)6 and attached Table 5-2 of the Enforcement Rule of the Immigration Control Act, the status of stay in Korea (D-2) is changed and the status of stay in Korea (D-2) is examined