1. The defendant

A. The Plaintiff A’s KRW 29,965,394 and its related KRW 5% per annum on September 25, 2015, and the following day on September 2015.

1. Basic facts

A. On December 3, 2004, Mapo-gu Seoul Mapo-gu, designated a housing site development district (title:O housing site development project) under the Housing Site Development Promotion Act by N on December 3, 2004, and the development plan was approved. The Defendant was designated as the executor of the above OO housing site development project (hereinafter “instant project”), and the said prearranged housing site development district was designated as the executor of the said project.

B. On March 2, 2004, the Defendant made a public announcement for the designation of the planned housing site development area, and on February 13, 2006, publicly announced a compensation plan on March 2, 2004, setting the base date for relocation measures for the instant project as of March 2, 2004 and notified the landowner and person concerned of the compensation plan.

C. The development area of the instant business is 341,811 square meters; among them, the paid supply area is 193,538 square meters, and the free supply area is 148,273 square meters.

The total project cost of the project of this case is KRW 513,97,226,958 in total as shown below. The project cost per item is specified below.

The amount classified (cost) x 1,573,073,93,859 direct personnel cost 1,801,801,239,232,322,321,340 infrastructure cost 32,073,93,859 direct personnel cost 1,801,676,131 (the cost of relocation measures for the installation of infrastructure cost for the construction of land non-use cost) x 1,576,025,97 indirect cost sales cost 560,039 (the direct personnel cost for the construction of infrastructure cost for the construction of infrastructure non-use cost) x 363,206,927,245,215 (the cost of relocation measures directly for the construction cost of infrastructure non-use cost for the construction of infrastructure) x the cost of relocation measures for the construction of infrastructure x 8,790,79,794,297,2395,297

E. As part of the relocation measures for those who lost their means of living due to the expropriation of their owned housing or land, the Defendant is incorporated into the instant project district, and as part of the relocation measures for the Plaintiff A, C, F, H, H and P, Q, Q, R, S, and T, an apartment building to be developed within the project district due to the implementation of the instant project (hereinafter referred to as the “instant apartment building”).