A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for one year.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for a period of two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

The Defendant served as a high school teacher from March 2015 to December 31, 2015, and was a teacher of the Victim F from March 2015.

The Defendant, on December 28, 2015, ordered students to volunteer activities on the upper school rooftop around 14:00 on December 28, 2015, reported the victim, who was late on the rooftop, and made the victim a seal with a machine for making seals in the electronic circuit room.

In the proposal, the victim takes the victim into the electronic circuit room, and sees the victim's seal out of it, and sponss the victim with the defective body, sponss the victim, fit the victim with the victim, and tphers of the victim.

Accordingly, the defendant committed an indecent act against the juvenile victim by force.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Statement of the police statement related to G;

1. Report on video recording investigation, investigation report (Attachment of student counseling), application of statutes governing stenographic records to victims;

1. Relevant Article 7 (3) of the Act on the Protection of Juveniles against Sexual Abuse and Article 298 of the Criminal Act concerning the criminal facts of which the choice of a child has been made;

1. Article 53 and Article 55 (1) 3 of the Criminal Act (Article 55 and Article 55 (1) 3 of the Criminal Act (The following extenuating circumstances among the reasons for sentencing)

1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act on the suspended execution (Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act on the following grounds for sentencing);

1. The main sentence of Article 21 (2) of the Act on the Protection of Children and Juveniles against Sexual Abuse;

1. There is a risk of sexual assaulting or recommitting a crime because the exempted child from an order of disclosure and notification has no record of punishment for a sexual crime, under the proviso to Article 49 (1) or the proviso to Article 50 (1) of the Act on the Protection of Juveniles against Sexual Abuse (the accused has been punished for a sexual crime

It is difficult to conclude that the Defendant’s act of committing the instant crime is divided and reflected, and the Defendant’s personal information registration of the Defendant and participation in sexual assault treatment can be expected to some extent to prevent recidivism.

Other benefits that can be expected by the disclosure disclosure order of this case.