The judgment of the court below is reversed.

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for six months.

However, the period of two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

1. Summary of grounds for appeal;

A. The lower court’s sentence (2.00,000 won) against the Defendant is too unreasonable.

B. The lower court’s sentence against the Defendant by the Prosecutor is too unhued and unreasonable.

2. We examine ex officio the grounds for appeal by the defendant and prosecutor prior to the judgment

In the trial of the party, the prosecutor asked the victim J(55 tax) and the employee E(32 tax) to find the facts charged of the instant case at the point of “D” located in Busan-gu Busan-gu, Busan-do, on February 16, 2018, on the ground that entertainment entertainment service personnel brought his own visibility, and asked the victim J(55 tax) and E(32 tax) who is the president to find it. The victim E calculates his match and needs to do so.

For reasons of the fact that the victims appeared to have taken a sound mind, the term "Maerer" blades (7.5 cm in blades) which are dangerous objects in their own household, from among the victims, shall be cut off twice in a knife and discarded to the victims, and the victims shall be dead and discarded.

“.....”

Accordingly, the defendant carried dangerous articles and threatened victims, respectively.

It was changed to "," and applied for permission to amend the Bill of Indictment in addition to "Article 40 of the Criminal Code" under the applicable law, and this Court permitted this.

In this respect, the judgment of the court below cannot be maintained as it is.

3. In conclusion, the judgment of the court below is reversed pursuant to Article 364(2) of the Criminal Procedure Act and it is again decided as follows, without examining the aforementioned ex officio reversal grounds.

[Judgment in other words] On February 16, 2018, at the main point of "D" located in Busan-gu Busan-gu, Busan-do around 01:35, the Defendant: (a) made a call to search for the victim J(55) and the victim E (32) who is an employee on the ground that the entertainment receptionr brought about his own visibility; (b) made a call; and (c) the victim E makes a call.

on the ground that it appears that it was “,” and that it appears that it was.