Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 5,000,000.

When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

Punishment of the crime

The defendant is a person engaged in dump truck driving.

On February 8, 2017, the Defendant driven the above cargo vehicle around 13:52, and led to the crossing of D's three distance in front of the D's oil station in Gyeongbuk-gun, Gyeongbuk-gun, to the inside of the direction from the breadth.

At the time, the victim E(70) driving was proceeding in front of the defendant's proceeding direction.

In this situation, drivers who want to overtake should safely pass ahead by sending signals to the front vehicle, and in particular, the said intersection has a duty of care to avoid passing ahead.

Nevertheless, the Defendant received the front part of the truck as the front part of the instant truck by negligence, which led to overtaking in the intersection, which is a place where the front is prohibited.

As a result, the Defendant suffered injury, such as a sexual scarcity, etc., on the part of the above occupational negligence, that the victim was suffering from injury to the victim, such as a scarcity scarf within the chest scarf which requires approximately eight weeks medical

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. A protocol concerning the examination of the police officer in G;

1. Reporting on the occurrence of a traffic accident, a survey report on actual condition, and on-site photographs;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes of a medical certificate;

1. Relevant legal provisions concerning criminal facts, Article 3(1) and the proviso to Article 3(2)4 of the Act on Special Cases concerning the Settlement of Traffic Accidents Aggravated Punishment, and Article 268 of the Criminal Act;

1. Article 70(1) and Article 69(2) of the Criminal Act to attract a workhouse;

1. Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act provides that the degree of injury suffered by the victim due to a traffic accident caused by the defendant's negligence for the reason of sentencing of the sentencing of Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act, and that the defendant's previous conviction, who was punished for the violation of the Act on Special Cases Concerning the Settlement of Traffic Accidents, has only one kind of criminal records and can be punished for a traffic-related crime, is disadvantageous to the defendant, or that the defendant recognizes the defendant's mistake and reflects it, or that the defendant does not have the victim'