Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 3,000,000.

When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

Punishment of the crime

No one may intermediate a third party's communications using telecommunications services provided by a telecommunications business operator or provide such services for a third party's communications.

Nevertheless, from December 2017 to January 2018, the Defendant: (a) received a proposal from a mobile phone agency with which the trade name near the two Dongs of the Daegu-gu and the Daegu-gu Northerndong cannot be known; (b) from a person whose name he/she became aware of through B, “it is necessary to create a game ID in order to operate the game workplace; (c) opened a cell phone in the name of the party and changed the core chip; and (d) transferred six mobile phones (C, D, E, F, G, and H) registered in the name of the Defendant to a person whose name the core chip of each mobile phone cannot be known.

Accordingly, the defendant provided telecommunications services provided by telecommunications business operators for another's communications.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. A copy and a written statement of the I;

1. The application of Acts and subordinate statutes to a seizure warrant, reply, and correspondence data meeting;

1. Article 97 subparagraph 7 of the Telecommunications Business Act and the main sentence of Article 30 of the relevant Act on criminal facts;

1. Articles 40 and 50 of the Criminal Act of the Commercial Concurrent Crimes;

1. Selection of an alternative fine for punishment;

1. Articles 70 (1) and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;

1. Article 334 (1) of the Criminal Procedure Act of the provisional payment order;