The defendant shall publicly announce the summary of the judgment against the defendant not guilty.

1. The summary of the facts charged in the instant case is that the Defendant was in the fifth grade 1 of E elementary school in Goyang-gu, Goyang-gu.

A. The Defendant: (a) around March 5, 2015, in the process of mixing F, a student of the same half-year class during class hours, with the fact that F, a student of the same half-year class, is prone to the victim; (b) f, f, f, f, f, f, and f, f, f, f, and f, f

B. On April 1, 2015, the Defendant: (a) during art hours, during which he/she was aware of his/her face at one-half class of the fifth grade class class on April 1, 2015, he/she finds out only the damaged person as an out-of-the-class corridor in the classroom while he/she gets married.

C. On April 13, 2015, the Defendant did not impose punishment on a student H who fessing a son during class hours in a class of the fifth-year class class on April 13, 2015, but was a student I who has deducted her mother and child, and the victim who was a victim I and next to the student I who had taken the her mother and child from the her mother and child, while giving a punishment by using

D. On April 16, 2015, the Defendant engaged in emotional abuse by continuously committing a discriminatory act against the victim’s defect, such as “the victim who caused the mix of the mix of the mix of the mix of the mix of the mix of the mix of the mix of the mix of the mix of the mix of the mix of the mix of the mix of the mix of the mix of the mix of the mix of the m

E. On April 20, 2015, the Defendant: (a) on the ground that the victimized person did not separately collect his/her horses on April 20, 2015; (b) on the ground that the Defendant did not do so; (c)

Does not be equal to persons within the territory of

In addition, the victim’s head head was assaulted once to commit physical abuse on the face of a luxed bridge with solid paper.

2. Part of the charges of this case’s emotional abuse (A. through D.)

Judgment as to paragraph (1)

A. The Prosecutor’s Office refers to the Defendant’s intent to discriminate against the victim with other students, among the facts charged in the instant case.

The public prosecution of this case seems to have been instituted on the premise that the same act as the mentioned in the subsection (hereinafter referred to as the “instant act”) was committed.

B. Comprehensively taking account of the evidence duly adopted and examined by this court, the Defendant.