logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울중앙지방법원 2018.09.14 2018고정973
퇴거불응등
Text

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 3,000,000.

When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

While the Defendant leased the first floor, the first floor, and the second floor of the Gangnam-gu Seoul D D Building and operated the sexual outdoor department, the Defendant leased part of the second floor to the victim E on December 2, 2016, which led to the continuation of mutual dispute.

1. On April 29, 2017, the Defendant refused to withdraw from the 22:30 on April 29, 2017, in the “F Councilor” room operated by the injured party on the 2nd floor of the said building, whether the victim was installing CCTV, and whether the victim and the victim “Isson construction.”

The term "the CCTV" victim has installed CCTV because there is no object in the center room.

“Is that, if so, do not do so, do so,” and had been in common with the victim at the same time after the answer of the defect “Is itself.”

G was trying to see himself/herself, and even though the victim requested several times to leave the above room, he/she continued to do so and did not leave the room.

Accordingly, the defendant did not comply with the demand of the victim to leave without justifiable reasons.

2. Around May 17, 2017, the Defendant invadedd with a nurse to take a photograph on the ground that the victim’s hospital was off at the VIP hospital located in the above victim’s hospital, but the victim’s hospital was off at the time of the director’s director, and the victim’s company confirmed the goods to be returned from the victim’s director.

Accordingly, the defendant invadeds on the room possessed by others.

3. On May 18, 2017, the Defendant: (a) removed the 2nd floor of the building as described in paragraph (1) around 14:00, and moved into the 1st floor and the 1st underground floor; (b) removed the bridge installed in the hospital staff of the said victim and the 2nd female toilets used by customers on the ground that he/she was himself/herself; and (c) prevented the Defendant from using the said toilets by divinging the water valves without installing a lid lid for the urine.

Accordingly, the defendant interfered with the victim's hospital business by force.

Summary of Evidence

1. Partial statement of the defendant;

1. The victim E;

arrow