logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울중앙지방법원 2016.01.15 2015고정4445
폭력행위등처벌에관한법률위반(공동주거침입)등
Text

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of one million won.

If the defendant does not pay the above fine, KRW 100,000.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

The Defendant is a member of the D non-regular working group D(hereinafter referred to as the "E branch") affiliated with the desired labor union.

E Branch was established around March 30, 2014 by a trade union consisting of 50 co-owners, etc. who have entered into an entrustment contract with D Co., Ltd. (hereinafter referred to as D) for the installation and repair of Internet communications networks.

E Around May 21, 2014, the said 50 collaborative companies entrusted with the right to negotiate a fyponism with the Korean Management Group (hereinafter referred to as the “KGG”) and from around May 21, 2014, the E branch notified the collective bargaining of the demand for unions such as wage, wage, and fund contribution, etc. from October 21, 2014 to carry out the requirements, such as recognition of the status of workers of the general public and the direct participation in the negotiations by organizations, and declared the final negotiation.

The labor union members of one E branch continuously demanded that they be directly involved in group negotiations D, and also decided to enter into the H building in which the president of the company affiliated with the G company moved into the H building because they requested an interview with the executives of the G company, although they did not accept such a claim.

1. Around 09:00 on January 6, 2015, the Defendant violated the Punishment of Violences, etc. Act (joint residential intrusion) entered into a four-story customer meeting room through emergency stairs and elevators to demand an interview with the executive officers of the headquarters of the G company, with more than 600 union members of the E branch office E in order to demand an interview with the executive officers of the headquarters of the G company. Then, the G company’s 221 union members and other security staff, M, N, etc., who were performing the H building security duties together with the 221 union members to occupy the 4th floor of the same building occupied by the G company J president of the G company.

After that, the Trade Union and Labor Relations Adjustment Board including the defendant.

arrow