logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 대전지방법원 2019.12.11 2019가단111667
손해배상(자)
Text

1.(a)

Defendant E’s 22,125,90 won for Plaintiff A and 3.95% per annum from January 18, 2017 to December 11, 2019.

Reasons

1. Determination as to the claim against Defendant E

A. The description of the claim is as shown in the separate sheet of claim(s) and “a modified cause of claim(s).”

(b) Judgment by based service by publication (Article 208 (3) 3 of the Civil Procedure Act);

2. Determination as to the claim against Defendant D Co., Ltd.

A. On February 26, 2016, Plaintiff C concluded a comprehensive automobile insurance policy (including personal injury insurance, personal injury insurance, personal injury insurance, and personal body accident) with respect to Defendant D Co., Ltd. (FF Co., Ltd.; hereinafter “Defendant D”) and G Abspurged vehicles (hereinafter “Plaintiff D”) with respect to the insurance period from February 26, 2016 to February 24, 2017. On February 26, 2016, Plaintiff C concluded an accident insurance contract with intent to compensate for the maximum of 200 million won per person when the insured died or died of an accident caused by an non-insurance accident.

(B) On August 27, 2016, the Plaintiff’s husband and wife of Plaintiff B (hereinafter “instant insurance contract”). Defendant A stopped the J FD vehicle (hereinafter “instant vehicle”) on the three-lanes in front of the I cafeteria located in Daejeon U.S. H on August 17, 2016, around 17:30, while driving the Plaintiff’s vehicle on one-lanes to one-lanes in order to walk along the opposite lane, and driving the vehicle on one-lanes of Plaintiff A’s driving vehicle on one-lanes.

(hereinafter “the instant accident” refers to “the instant accident scene”. As a result, Plaintiff A suffered bodily injury, such as the structural frame of the left side and the structural frame of the inner wall. D) K (Defendant E’s workplace compensation)

(1) The instant accident is the owner of the instant vehicle, and entered into a limited driving comprehensive insurance contract with L Co., Ltd. and one named insured with K as the insured, and the instant accident is not a security for personal compensation II. [The fact that there is no dispute over the grounds for recognition, A.

arrow