beta
Text
Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 10 million.
If the defendant does not pay the above fine, KRW 100,000.
Reasons
Punishment of the crime
The Defendant presented false documents against the victim E, and neglected his own self-sufficiency on the following grounds: “The Bank of HSBC holds USD 10 billion ($ 11,000),” or “the possession of a certificate of deposit issued by a national bank equivalent to KRW 500 billion.”
1. The Defendant involved in hospital expenses is a financial expert who raised funds in the U.S. defense nature to the victim by telephone conversations on February 2012.
F has been used by F together with his mother in Korea. The hospital fee will be settled at the time of discharge on the face of the State by paying the hospital fee.
“A false statement” was made.
However, there was no intention or ability to change the above even if the victim pays hospital fees on behalf of the victim due to the lack of assets held by the defendant.
The Defendant: (a) deceiving the victim as above; and (b) had the victim pay KRW 15,840,040 on March 22, 2012 to the Central University Hospital for the purpose of hospital expenses; (c) KRW 126,180 on March 28, 2012; (d) KRW 36,280 on April 3, 2012; and (e) KRW 22,530 on April 9, 2012; and (e) KRW 2,00,00 on April 9, 2012; and (e) had the victim pay KRW 1,439,610 on April 13, 2012; and (e) acquired the economic benefits equivalent to the said amount by having the victim pay KRW 19,464,640 on total six occasions in lieu of the amount of KRW 19,64,610 on March 28, 2012.
2. On April 19, 2012, the Defendant involved in hotel expenses suffered a lot of time for the victim to “the special account withdrawal process that our account uses is complicated and the IMF approves.”
F It is expected that F will pay accommodation expenses to the hotel located in Seoul, with the payment of accommodation expenses.
“A false statement” was made.
However, the defendant did not have any intention or ability to change the right even if the victim pays the hotel fee on behalf of the victim because of the lack of property at the time.
The defendant deceivings the victim as above and let the victim take accommodation expenses.