A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for six months.

However, the execution of the above sentence shall be suspended for a period of one year from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

(e).

Punishment of the crime

On May 19, 2016, the Defendant: (a) took an inquiry of the circumstances of the instant case from C(28) of the police box of Busan Central Police Station B, which was called by the Defendant on May 19, 2016, by assaulting the Defendant’s taxi engineer; (b) took an inquiry from C(28) of the police box of Busan Central Police Station B of Police Station B (28) to the police station of Busan Central Police Station; and (c) took an inquiry of the circumstances of the instant case, and (d) took one time to walk the bridge part of the said C, who was arrested as a current offender interfering with the performance of public duties and was carrying out the patrol to the B police box, and assaulted the said C by walking the parts of the said C from the patrol to walk one time.

Accordingly, the defendant interfered with the legitimate execution of duties by police officers on criminal investigation.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. A protocol concerning the examination of the accused;

1. Application of the Statement Statement and Investigation Report Act to C and D

1. Article 136 (1) of the Criminal Act, and the choice of punishment for the crime;

1. The reason for sentencing under Article 62(1) of the Criminal Act of the suspended sentence [Scope of Recommendation] The execution of imprisonment shall be suspended in consideration of the following: (a) the basic area (from June to one year and four months) (the person in charge of special sentencing) (the person in charge of special sentencing) (the decision of sentencing) [the decision of sentencing] there is no history of being punished due to interference with or violence in the performance of official duties, nor there is no history of being punished due to interference with or violence, (b) there is no history of being fined one time, and there is no specific history of being fined, and (c)

Rejection of Public Prosecution

1. Around May 19, 2016, the summary of the facts charged (Assault) stated that “The Defendant did not pay the fare after using the victim G (48 years old) in the presence of the F Tax Office located in Busan Jung-gu, Busan (hereinafter “F Tax Office”) and did not pay the fare, thereby demanding the victim to pay the taxi fee.” On his hand, the Defendant assaulted the victim at one time at the victim’s speed.

2. The offense of assaulting the victim shall not be prosecuted against the clearly expressed will of the victim under Article 260(3) of the Criminal Act as an offense falling under Article 260(1) of the Criminal Act.

Accordingly, the agreement submitted on June 17, 2016 is followed.