1. The defendant is based on the completion of the acquisition by prescription on November 15, 199 with respect to the real estate stated in the attached list to the plaintiff.

1. The facts of recognition were as follows: (a) the Defendant was in arrears with national taxes due to the business difficulties in around 1979; (b) the Defendant was in progress with a public auction process on the land of 105-5 large 71 square meters and 105-10 large 40 square meters and 105 large 244 square meters and 244 square meters (205-5 square meters and the same 1983 square meters and the same as that of 1983); (c) the land of 448-6 large 1,001 square meters and 448-6 large 1,001, Seoul Mapo-gu, Mapo-gu, Seoul Metropolitan Government, and the land of 448-6 and 3 lots (2 ice-2, warehouse and office).

(1) The Plaintiff purchased real estate for sale on October 18, 1979 at KRW 485,00,000 in a lump sum and paid the price on November 16, 1979, and completed the registration of ownership transfer on November 26, 1979.

Attached Form

On December 8, 1975, the real estate stated in the list falls under the Annexed Building of the above ground, which was included in the sale, as a building on the second floor located on the fourth lot of land for the purpose of sale, and the registration of preservation of ownership was completed in the name of the defendant on December 8, 1975.

[Grounds for Recognition: Evidence A 2-1 to Evidence A 3, Evidence A 5-1 to 9-9, and the purport of the whole pleadings]

2. The plaintiff asserts that the plaintiff purchased the real estate listed in the separate sheet from the defendant at the time the plaintiff acquired the real estate for sale in a lump sum.

It is insufficient to recognize that the real estate stated in the separate sheet No. 4 alone was included in the subject matter of sale in the above public sale procedure, or that a separate sales contract for real estate stated in the separate sheet was concluded on November 16, 1979 between the plaintiff and the defendant, and there is no other evidence to acknowledge it.

Therefore, it is difficult to accept the Plaintiff’s primary claim.

3. Judgment on the conjunctive claim

A. The gist of the parties’ assertion is that the Plaintiff occupies the real estate indicated in the separate sheet for twenty (20) years from November 16, 1979.