logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
Text
Reasons
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울북부지방법원 2018.02.21 2017고단3431
사기등
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for six months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for a period of two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

[2017 Highest 3431] On June 17, 2017, the Defendant was provided with alcohol and alcohol equivalent to KRW 65,000 in total, including 5 C, 1stal, 1stal, and 1stal, and 65,000, as the Defendant would pay the amount of alcohol to the victim’s “D main points” in the operation of the Victim C, Jung-gu Seoul, Seoul, around 21:0.

At that time, the Defendant did not have any other means of payment other than 30,000 won in cash, so there was no intention or ability to pay the price even if he/she takes an order of alcohol, etc. as above.

Ultimately, the Defendant was provided with a total of 65,000 won by deceiving the victim.

[2017 고단 4951] 1. 업무 방해 피고인은 2017. 10. 26. 19:10 경 서울 노원구 E 소재 F 식당 내에서 술에 취한 상태로 종업원인 피해자 G( 여, 50세 )를 향해 " 사장 나와 봐, 사장 어딨어 "라고 하면서 약 20 여분에 걸쳐 욕설을 하고 고함을 지르는 등 소란을 피워 피해자의 식당 영업 업무를 방해 하였다.

2. In order to verify the reported content by the victim H, the police officer dispatched after receiving a report at the time and place as stated in paragraph 1, the Defendant’s insultd the victim’s statement against the customer of the said restaurant, why the victim Da Da Da heard “I h h h h h.

“Along with the time limit, the victim was at any time, and the victim was at any time, and the victim was at any time, “Along with the last day of the Camp, Iim Imar, Imar;

The Board of Governors (hereinafter referred to as "the Board of Governors") held that the Board of Governors

The victim openly insultingd the victim from among the employees such as the above G and the customers by means of a large voice, etc.

Summary of Evidence

[2017 Highest 3431]

1. Partial statement of the defendant;

1. A protocol concerning the examination of the police officers of the accused;

1. The C’s statement (the Defendant was in possession of the physical card in the name of KRW 30,00 and KRW 30,000 in cash at the time of the instant case, and thus was willing and ability to pay the price.

The argument is asserted.

However, the defendant was investigated by the police at the time of the crime of this case, only 30,000 won in cash.

arrow