logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 대구지방법원 2015.07.17 2015고정920
전자금융거래법위반등
Text

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 1,500,000.

When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

No person of "2015 high-level 920" shall transfer or acquire any cash card or passbook attached with his/her belt (a password necessary for the use of a cash card, a user number registered with a financial institution or an electronic financial institution), etc., which is the means of electronic financial transactions.

Nevertheless, on August 2014, the Defendant transferred a national bank (B) passbook, a physical card, and an Internet banking security card in the name of the Defendant at the Internet service site (B) around the Dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-

"2015 High Court 1184"

1. On February 19, 2014, even if the Defendant received money from the victim C on February 19, 2014, he/she took up a notice to the effect that he/she would not have any intent or ability to sell the wall, and then, he/she received KRW 53,000 from the victim C by making a false statement to the victim C, who reported the fact that “the remittance of money would return the said money to the home-house,” and thereby, received KRW 53,000 from the victim C to the account under the name of the Defendant.

Accordingly, the defendant was given property by deceiving the victim C.

2. On June 30, 2014, around June 30, 2014, the Defendant, even if receiving money from the victim G in the “F” bank located in the Daegu-gu Seo-gu Seoul metropolitan month E, posted a notice to the effect that, even if the Defendant did not have any intent or ability to sell the wall, he/she sold the wall to the Internet Middle Ga Ga Ga, and then, he/she received 40,000 won from the victim G by making a false statement to the effect that, “if he/she transfers money, he/she will send the said money to his/her home” to the victim G, who reported it.

In this respect, the defendant deceivings the victim G, thereby property.

arrow