1. Of the judgment of the court of first instance, the part against the defendant in excess of the money ordered to be paid below shall be revoked.

1. The following facts do not conflict between the parties or may be found in full view of Gap evidence Nos. 1 through 6, 9, 10, 13, 14, 16, 16 through 19, Eul evidence Nos. 1, 3, and 4 (including the whole number of evidence), G witnesses of the first instance trial, part of the witness G of the first instance trial, the result of the appraisal of the construction price of the first instance appraiser H of the first instance trial (including each fact inquiry; hereinafter the same shall not be trusted only to the part contrary to the result of the appraisal of the first instance appraiser L), the result of the inquiry of the first instance court into I, the result of the appraisal of the construction price of the first instance appraiser L (including the result of each supplementary appraisal), and the purport of all arguments.

On February 2, 2010, the Defendant (hereinafter “D”) constructed ten studio buildings (hereinafter “studio buildings” in this case) in the cudio building at a permanent residence around February 2010, and requested the Plaintiff to build the painting construction among the construction works (hereinafter “studio buildings”).

On March 16, 2010, the Plaintiff submitted a written estimate (hereinafter referred to as “written estimate”) with the following contents to the Defendant, and completed the construction work on March 20, 2010, starting with the instant painting work on March 20, 2010.

【Contents of a estimate” 【25,000 won in Coding 2, 25,000 won in the unit price of a unit price name name name, 6,000 won in a pattern pattern (including co-rating) / [10,000 won in a plot 10,000 square meter / [15,000 square meters in a square meter / [2,000 square meters in a square meter / [15,000 square meters in a square meter] 150,000 / Dong parking lot (cel in a square meter) / three times in a parking lot (bel in a square), 8,000 won in a square meter 25,00 won in a square meter / [2] 3,000 won in an external water number of 3,000 won in a

B. At the time of the instant painting construction, the Plaintiff carried out the co-rating work on the remainder of the instant studio building with the exception of 459.4 square meters in part of the studio parking lot of the first floor among the instant studio buildings (the independent columns tanking the upper floor of the building) twice. The studio is included in the instant studs among the instant quotation, and the unit price is 2,500 won per 1 square meter.

C. From March 18, 2010 to the 20th day of that month, the Plaintiff is a rooftop of the studio building E and the Fudio building at the time of resident stay built by the Defendant.