beta
Text
A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for a term of one year and two months.
However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for three years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.
Reasons
Punishment of the crime
"2015 Highest 4271"
1. On May 2, 2015, around 18:30 on May 2, 2015, the Defendant sold approximately 0.1g of psychotropic drugs to D, at the Defendant’s home located in the Busan Eastdong-gu C building 1911, and sold approximately 0.1g of psychotropic drugs to D, for 100,000 won.
2. Even if the Defendant is not a narcotics handler, on June 6, 2015, sold approximately 0.05g 0.05g philopon to D at the same place as indicated in paragraph (1), and sold narcotics to D for 50,000 won.
3. Even if the Defendant is not a narcotics handler, on June 22, 2015, the Defendant sold and purchased narcotics, etc. at the same place as indicated in paragraph (1), and at 100,000 won, approximately 0.5g of philphones to D, at the same time as indicated in paragraph (1).
4. Even if the Defendant is not a narcotics handler, on June 24, 2015, sold narcotics, etc. after selling approximately 0.33g of clopon to D at the same place as indicated in paragraph (1), and selling them to D 100,000 won.
5. Even if the Defendant is not a narcotics handler, on June 25, 2015, around 20:30, at the same place as indicated in paragraph (1), and divided into three types of disposable injection machines, and possessed narcotics, etc. by inserting approximately 0.33 grams of philopon in a bal bags.
around 20:41 on April 29, 2015, the Defendant, “2015 Man-Ma4709,” driven the E-mail-man car owned by the Defendant, and led to the direction of the Maritime Rehabilitation Center in the direction of the return of the 2nd public parking lot in front of the return of Busan Metropolitan City.
A person engaged in driving service has a duty of care to safely drive by reducing speed at a crosswalk where signal lights are installed and by examining the right and the right of the crosswalk.
Nevertheless, the Defendant neglected this and proceeded with the stop signal while disregarding the fact that the vehicle progress signal is changed to the stop signal, and instead, the Defendant got the victim F (the age of 33) who dried the crosswalk in accordance with the pedestrian green signals (the age of 33) in front of the said car.
Ultimately, the Defendant above.