Defendant

B shall be punished by a fine of KRW 1,000,000.

Defendant

B If the above fine is not paid, 100,000 won.

Punishment of the crime

Defendant

B On January 31, 2014, at around 23:20, at the Mannam City, a police box located in the Mannam City, wherein seven police officers are deemed to have committed assault against Defendant A, the victim F (the 52 years old), who was under the control of the Mandong, “I am out of the man, Han Han Han, Han Han Han, Han Han Han, I am, I am out of the man Han Han Ha, I am, I am, I am of the Korean police box, I am the victim of the Man Han Han Hah, I am, I am, I am, I am of the Man

Summary of Evidence

1. Partial statement of the defendant;

1. Statement of the police statement concerning F;

1. Application of the Acts and subordinate statutes to the complaint;

1. Article 311 of the Criminal Act and Article 311 of the same Act concerning criminal facts and the choice of fines;

1. Articles 70 (1) and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;

1. The defendant's assertion as to the claim by the defendant B under Article 334 (1) of the Criminal Procedure Act is merely a police officer F, who first takes the victim's desire to do so and takes a bath against him/her, and thus, the illegality of the act as a justifiable act that does not go against social rules is denied. However, according to evidence, even though the defendant notified several times that the victim may be punished as a crime of insult in cases where the victim takes a bath to a police officer, it is acknowledged that the defendant had expressed the victim's desire as stated in the facts charged even though the police officer first takes a bath to the defendant at the police box, as alleged by the defendant, regardless of the legitimacy of the purpose, such act by the defendant cannot be evaluated as a justifiable act that does not violate social rules, since it cannot be evaluated as meeting the requirements of the means and method, urgency, and supplement.

Public Prosecution Rejection Parts

1. Facts charged;

A. Defendant A, at around January 31, 2014, 22:30, performed a breath of the victim’s laps, on the ground that the victim B (the victim B) was at the front of the Manam-si G street, and the horses were at random.